Transferable Skills: my involvement with the Jimmy Shand Collection in Dundee

cropped-wighton-instr-logo_square-1-300x300Yesterday, I was at the Wighton Centre in Dundee, where I’m honorary librarian of the Friends of Wighton – it’s a charity set up to look after and augment the Wighton Collection, a renowned collection of historical music which has been housed in Dundee public library since the 19th century.
Today, we were launching the Jimmy Shand Collection, which is 23 antiquarian volumes that were bought at auction from the estate of the late Scottish dance-band musician. There were local dignitaries, and Mr and Mrs Jimmy Shand Jnr were also with us.

The Friends of Wighton support music classes in traditional instruments, and some of the musicians played for the launch today. I’m sure Andrew Wighton and his widow would have been pleased that his original epic collection is still been drawn upon for repertoire, and has now had these expertly-conserved scores – once owned by Jimmy Shand – added to it. Jimmy Shand Jnr. made a brief speech in which it was clear that the family are delighted to see their Dad’s music beautifully restored and made available to the local community – and much of it has also been digitized to further its reach.From my point of view, I spend my working week surrounded by conservatoire musicians who play at a very high level, and I enjoy the contrast of seeing other talented musicians out in the community, sharing their skills with people who perhaps haven’t the same musical background, but are still clearly getting personal pleasure from learning to play traditional tunes in the company of other like-minded folk. You could say it’s music for everyone, and not just for the gifted individuals who will set the world alight in their future careers. That’s exactly how it should be.My involvement with the Wighton Collection goes back a number of years now, though I’ve only been Hon. Librarian for a comparatively short time. It’s not directly related to my Claimed From Stationers’ Hall research, but I certainly do draw on knowledge and experienced gained in that respect, so there’s a kind of sideways, indirect link.

If you’d like to see photos of yesterday’s launch, do visit the network Facebook page! https://www.facebook.com/ClaimedStatHall/

And a wee postscript!  I was back in Dundee this morning to talk to a TV reporter about the Wighton Collection and the Shand volumes.  I don’t think there’ll be anything to see for a while, so I’ll update you when it does!

Newsletter, August 2018

The latest Claimed From Stationers’ Hall Newsletter is live!  Read it here.

menu on CFSH websiteFor your convenience (and the benefit of my Researchfish entries), there’s now a page with links to all  Newsletters.  You’ll find it here – or from the Menu bar on the homepage of this website.

Researchfish – Little Fish in a Big Pond

When one is awarded a grant by a major research body, obviously accountability is a fishmosaicvery important consideration.  To that end, activities have to be logged on the poetically-named but very definitely serious Researchfish website.  All big scholarly funders use it, asking for details of such matters as publications arising out of the research, further funding, engagement activities (there’s quite a bit I can enter here!) and so on.

At first sight, it’s a bit intimidating, but once I’d downloaded a list of “Common Outcome Types with sub-types”, and crossed out the columns in which no-one would remotely expect me to have outputs (Medical Products, Interventions and Clinical Trials, or such Research Tools as Biological samples, or human models of mechanisms or symptoms), it didn’t look quite so bad.  I do feel a bit like a little fish in a big pond compared to people winning major awards to find cures for horrific diseases, design new space rockets, or solve the greater political and social conundrums of our age.  Still, one has to start somewhere!

So, my activity for the rest of today will be to go through the list I’ve already compiled, and add the various presentations, blogs and guest-blogposts, and so on, and just see how far I get!  For one-and-a-half days a week over 13 months, it looks okay – well, in my opinion, at any rate!  As I’ve said often enough before, watch this space.

 

 

Sacred Harmonic Society (Grove Music)

One of those chains of enquiry where one thing leads to another!  Should I need to know later, here’s the Oxford Music Online entry for the choral society for which Husk was librarian:- Sacred Harmonic Society | Grove Music

Husk, William Henry (Grove Music)

Husk was the Librarian of the Sacred Harmonic Society, and corresponded with William Chappell.  Having heard of him through researcher Alice Little, I looked him up in Oxford Music Online, just in case I needed to know about him later:-

Source: Husk, W(illiam) H(enry) | Grove Music

“England has no National Music”? Chappell set out to refute this!

In yesterday’s posting, I quoted from William Chappell’s Collection of National English Airs (1838-1840), which explained the motivation behind his first big collection.  Twenty years later, he published his Popular Music of the Olden Time, and he was by now even more determined to refute the allegation.  Here he is in the Introduction to PMOT:-

“I have been at some trouble to trace to its origin the assertion that the English have no national music.  It is extraordinary that such a report should have obtained credence, for England may safely challenge any nation not only to produce as much, but also to give the same satisfactory proofs of antiquity.  The report seems to have gained ground from the unsatisfactory selection of English airs in Dr Crotch’s Specimens of various Styles of Music; but the national music in that work was supplied by Malchair, a Spanish violin-player at Oxford, whose authority Crotch therein quotes.  It is perhaps not generally known that at the time of the publication Dr Crotch was but nineteen years of age.  No collection of English airs had at that time been made to guide Malchair, and he followed the dictum of Dr Burney in such passages as the following:-

“It is related by Giovanni Battista Donado that the Turks have a limited number of tunes … till the last century, it seems as if the number of our secular and popular melodies did not greatly exceed that of the Turks …”

“Again, in Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream … Burney inverts the stage direction and adds [here Chappell quotes a very derogatory list of old English national instruments!] …

“Dr Burney’s History is one continuous misrepresentation of English music and musicians, only rendered plausible by misquotation of every kind.”

(PMOT, Introduction, vi-vii)

Chappell’s book is a delight to read, because it is so informative about the contemporary view of so many aspects of music history – even if (as I’m reliably informed) he has got his facts wrong about Malchair’s ethnicity and Crotch’s age!  Moreover, even on the very first page, he writes about his sources, emphasising the importance of the British Museum (now the British Library collection), and acknowledging that he was also granted permission to examine and make extracts from the Registers of the Stationers’ Company to assist him in dating the airs.  (He was also familiar with the Bodleian and Ashmolean Libraries, the Society of Antiquities, the public library in Cambridge, Cheetham Library, Lincoln’s Inn Library, Marsh’s Library and Trinity College Dublin’s, the Advocates Library in Edinburgh, University of Ghent, and this is just a quick overview, not mentioning the many private individuals that he networked with.)

In both Chappell’s books, he writes about the era of “merry England”.  The era can be taken to encompass the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries, as is implicit in Ronald Hutton’s modern book, The rise and fall of merry England : the ritual year, 1400-1700 (2001).  Indeed, shortly after Chappell’s first collection appeared, George Daniel published Merrie England in the Olden Time (2 vols, 1842), which Chappell cited several times (inconsistently as “Merrie” AND “Merry” England) in PMOT, in a couple of instances specifically concerning the year 1691 .

 

The Picture of Fashion

Not so long ago, I encountered a Georgian picture of a cutter (sailing boat) in a music book that once belonged to Jimmy Shand, and today’s find was just as unexpected.  This book belonged to a woman – there’s no way of telling if it was she, or someone else, that drew a series of fashionable women in Victorian bustles and frills!  No, this has nothing to do with music, but I thought you might like to see the drawings all the same!  They’re in a copy of William Chappell’s A Collection of National English Airs belonging to the Whittaker Library at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland.

2018-08-17 11.15.052018-08-17 11.14.342018-08-17 11.14.57

And here’s the Georgian cutter from the Jimmy Shand collection in Dundee Central Library.  It was rather indistinct, but I’ve since interpreted it in my own, 21st century way:-

2018-04-28 15.26.20

James Young Musician ship cutter boat Shand Collection Dundee
An unfinished drawing from a book which belonged to musician James Young.

Curation and Documentation

In our research into the legal deposit music collected in British libraries during the Georgian era, a key thread is obviously the histories of individual collections between then, and now.  Two hundred years is a long time, so contemporary evidence is significant.

For example, in 1826, the pseudonymous Caleb Concord wrote in the (short-lived) Aberdeen Censor that the students at Aberdeen’s Marischal College should be more concerned about what had happened to the legal deposit music that had been claimed by Aberdeen’s other higher education institution, King’s College.  Corroborating this, Professor William Paul, who had once been librarian at King’s College, told an official commission in 1827, that he believed some of the music had been sold at some time before he went to the college, ie, before 1811.  (Commissioners for Visiting the Universities and Colleges of Scotland, Evidence, Oral and Documentary, Taken and Received by the Commissioners … for Visiting the Universities of Scotland.  Vol.4, Aberdeen (London: HMSO, 1837).  There is evidence for Stationers’ Hall music having been sold at Edinburgh University in the late eighteenth century, too.

In St Andrews, by contrast, there are not only archival records documenting senate decisions about the library, but also the borrowing records, which I’ve written and blogged about quite a bit over the past couple of years – not to mention the handwritten catalogue by a niece of a deceased professor of the University.  A payment was made to her in the 1820s, but the catalogue continued to be updated until legal deposits ceased to be claimed by the University in 1836, when the legislation changed. (Miss Lambert married and moved to London in 1832, so the later years were not completed by her.)

Bibliographic Control

In the middle few decades of the nineteenth century, some of the libraries began to attempt better control and documentation of their music.  However, I don’t propose to write about every legal deposit library in this posting, because my main reason in writing today is to share a small but interesting excerpt from William Chappell’s first book about English national songs.  Now, in my own doctoral thesis and subsequent book, I focused on Chappell’s later work, Popular Music of the Olden Time (1855-1859), and its later iteration, Old English Popular Music.  I mentioned that PMOT had grown out of his earlier Collection of National Airs (1838-1840), and I highlighted a few key features of that work.

A Rare Find

2018-08-17 11.12.52Today, sifting through a library donation of largely 20th century scores, I was astonished2018-08-17 11.15.05 to lift two obviously older volumes out of one of the boxes.  We’re now the proud owners of the third set of Collection of National Airs known to be held in Scotland.  Since I haven’t looked at this title for a decade or so, I leafed through both volumes briefly, to remind myself what they were like.  (The volumes had belonged to a Mrs Chambers, and either she or a young relative had practised their drawing skills on the flyleaves, but we’ll overlook those for now!)

2018-08-17 11.13.56Chappell’s work is in two volumes: the first contains the subscriber’s list and a preface, with the rest of the volume devoted to the tunes themselves. The second volume contains commentary, winding up with a conclusion and then an appendix.

England has no National Music

The preface opens with the words which have echoed (metaphorically speaking) in my ears since I first read them:-

“The object of the present work is to give practical refutation to the popular fallacy that England has no National Music,- a fallacy arising solely from indolence in collecting; for we trust that the present work will show that there is no deficiency in material, whatever there may have been in the prospect of encouragement to such Collections.”

Of course, Chappell was preoccupied with national songs (“folk songs”) and ballads – as was I, at the time I first read it.  So I hadn’t paid attention to a footnote later in the Preface.  But, as I read on, there it was – William Chappell commenting on the legal deposit music in what is now the British Library!  It is clear that the music – in Chappell’s eyes, at any rate – was in need of organisation.  (We now know that  it was much the same in Oxford, Edinburgh or Edinburgh’s Advocates’ Library – the forerunner of the National Library of Scotland.)

On page iv, Chappell named various key collections of British tunes, naming the British Museum (the forerunner of our British Library) as the repository for some of these collections.  A footnote afforded him the chance to make an aside about the contemporary custodial arrangements there.

Attentive, Obliging … Inaccessible, Not Catalogued

It is to be hoped that the attention of the Trustees may be soon drawn to the state of the invaluable Library of Music in the British Museum; for whilst the publisher is taxed a copy of every work, it is but just that it should be open to inspection.  At present, with the exception of a few works on Theory, which, being almost entirely letterpress, are included with the books, the Music is perfectly inaccessible, – not being catalogued or classed in any manner.  No persons can be more attentive or obliging than the attendants in the Reading-room, but in this they are unable to render any assistance.  It is not generally known that the manuscripts of the great Henry Purcell and many others are also in the Museum; but they are in the same state as the music, and are not to be seen.”

2018-08-17 11.09.45

Changing the subject, it’s interesting for us as modern readers to note that Chappell’s conclusion at the end of the second volume winds up with a sorrowful observation about the decline in musical education, since an unspecified time when music was a key part not only of a young gentleman’s education, but also of young children’s.

Merry England

“The Editor trusts, however, that he has already satisfactorily demonstrated the proposition which he at first stated, viz. that England has not only abundance of National Music, but that its antiquity is at least as well authenticated as that of any other nation.  England was formerly called “Merry England.”

Music taught in all public schools

“That was when every Gentleman could sing at sight;- when musical degrees were taken at the Universities, to add lustre to degrees in arts;- when College Fellowships were only given to those who could sing;- when Winchester boys were not suffered to evade the testator’s will, as they do now, but were obliged to learn to sing before they could enter the school;- when music was taught in all public schools, and thought as necessary a branch of the education of “small children” as reading or writing;- when barbers, cobblers and ploughmen, were proverbially musical;- and when “Smithfield with her ballads made all England roar.” Willingly would we exchange her present venerable title of “Old England,”, to find her “Merry England” once again.”

Chappell should read the commentary in today’s social media about the self-same topic!

 

Responding to Popular Request

Biteable.com Bear!
Biteable.com – instructor bear!

When I was doing my PGCert, I surveyed a cohort of postgraduate distance-learners to see what they thought of some brief instructional self-help clips that I had designed.  I asked for feedback, and I got it – short videos were very welcome, it seemed, but several students particularly asked for animations. I liked this idea – apart from wondering how I would achieve this!

When I found Biteable.com, I was quite excited – there are a number of templates and audio backgrounds to choose from, and you can just edit in your own text, changing colours and adding pictures as you choose.  I’ve already done a couple for this research network, and a couple of months ago I made one as a library guide, too.

This week, I made two more.  One is about setting up email alerts for our library discovery layer, and the video I’ve just curated today is about fake news – basically, not leaping to conclusions about things when you haven’t enough evidence to back your suppositions up.  It stemmed from Wednesday’s field trip.  It would have been great to have been able to say that I’d discovered a whole story about how certain music scores got into an old library collection.  But – as you’ll see – in truth, I haven’t enough evidence to back up my guesses, and my initial ideas are probably pure fantasy! The scores are there, some of them in what might be a legal deposit volume.  But to infer any connection between the scores by these two particular composers would, at present, be reckless in the extreme!

Anyway, do have a look.  I had fun making them, and I hope both videoclips will be useful.

Mystery in a Music Book

I was at Edinburgh University Library yesterday – I’m trying to work out which bound volumes might contain music that arrived through the legal deposit route.  I was looking at one particular volume, and came to a batch of pieces all by the same Edinburgh-based  composer.  I looked him up – and found he spent some time in Italy in his youth, under the direction of a particular teacher.

Then I remembered that I’d encountered some music BY that teacher, in a different volume.  And then – exploring the University Library catalogue – I found more by the Edinburgh composer AND more by the Italian musician.  Is it remotely possible that the individual who arranged for that legal deposit volume to be bound, also knew the Edinburgh musician?  It was some decades before music would have an official, recognised place in the University curriculum, but obviously some music was being collected.

Equally, might the music by the Italian – in another volume, not necessarily legal deposit, and in other volumes definitely not so – have come to Edinburgh in some way connected with his British pupil?

You might argue that this doesn’t have much to do with legal deposit.  In one sense, that’s true.  But if we’re thinking about what the University decided to keep, out of the legal deposit material that they received, then this is – if nothing else – quite interesting, surely?

As to the identity of these guys – well, let me enjoy the mystery a bit longer, once I’ve worked out if there’s any more to be discovered!