Special Note of Commendation

Although I didn’t win the Researcher-Practitioner award from my professional body, I was honoured to receive a special note of commendation today. This is a very nice thing to receive from CILIP’s LIRG (Library and Information Research Group) – I’m basking in the glow this evening!

” … special note of commendation to Karen. The panel particularly wanted to recognise Karen’s breadth of research work and scholarship and her ability to blend music research with librarianship.”

Spread Too Thin?

This is another of my cross-posts from the Facebook Glasgow Music Publishers page. But I’ve updated the update!

Apologies for the silence here. In recent weeks, I’ve given two conference papers (one on Stationers’ Hall music, and one on old Scots songs and a Lowland pipe tune); I gave another talk (about Scottish song-collector Alexander Campbell) last Sunday late afternoon. Was I happy with my talk? Yes, until I had given it! This self-doubt is really quite a handicap.

I have just had the luxury of a long weekend, but – well, it hasn’t been luxurious. As well as the Sunday talk, there was the usual domesticity and the church organist duties. We expected the roofer to start work today, too, but it rained – and you don’t remove a VERY large skylight in the rain! Not to worry – I turned one of my conference papers into a journal article and submitted it this evening. I’ve just realised I’m a coward. I submitted an article to a journal I’ve not submitted to before, and now I’m struggling NOT to judge it too harshly, probably before the editor has even checked their email inbox!

I really do have to get back to work on a book chapter – although neither it nor the rest of this frenetic activity has been about Glasgow music publishers! (I just hope their ghosts aren’t feeling neglected, or heaven help me come Hallowe’en!)

Researchfish – Safely reeled in!

Funded research clearly has to  be documented, and in the UK that involves uploading outputs to a website called Researchfish.  I’m glad I was just about up-to-date on my Researchfish entries, so it didn’t take excessively long to check a few entries and submit the whole thing.

It’s a good thing I checked, though.  The bibliography is on the blog – and the blog was logged literally ages ago.  But today I decided that the bibliography was such a huge output that it deserved its own mention.   And although I logged our Brio special issue over a month ago, elsewhere in my earlier narrative I had noted that it was “pending”.  I hastily updated that, too!  (The Brio issue is all there on Pure, our institutional repository, along with my other research outputs.)

fishing-3441090_960_720 PixabaySo as far as I’m concerned, the “fish” has been netted, weighed, documented and forwarded to the distributor!  I’ve hit SEND, and now all that remains is to apply for the next research grant.

Well, after a deserved coffee, anyway!

Living With the Guilt (Being a Part-Time Researcher)

My research career, beginning with the start of my doctoral studies in 2004, has been entirely on a part-time basis.  I studied part-time whilst I worked full-time, and have since then had several secondments to part-time research whilst spending the rest of my working week occupying my regular professional role.

During my doctoral studies, I grew accustomed to the niggling question, “am I doing enough research?”  (It was accompanied by, “am I doing this parenting lark adequately?!”)

I felt reasonably confident that my professional role wasn’t suffering – after all, when I was at that desk, I was working the work!  But, in my student capacity, I had the memory of what full-time research “felt like”, from a previous doctoral attempt, and it was hard persuading myself that no-one expected me to achieve as much, as fast, when I was doing it entirely in evenings, at weekends and on holiday.  (Reading early nineteenth-century commentaries whilst at Eurocamp? Oh yes, been there!)

Fast-forward to my present 70:30 existence (70% librarian, 30% postdoc).  Desperate to be taken seriously as a researcher, I struggle to achieve as much as the average academic, when I’m only a researcher for 10.5 hours a week.  Reading, writing, researching, editing, attending conferences … I drive myself to produce “output” at a rate that makes me look like a force to be reckoned with, but honesty forces me to concede that some of it has to be done at home, in my own time.

So, I reached this summer.  Since May, I’ve been a guest-speaker at a workshop in Paris, contributed a pecha kucha at a copyright literacy seminar closely followed by a paper at a week-long international history conference (both  in Edinburgh), been an after-dinner speaker at an engagement in the Highlands, and then – oh, blessed relief, came a fortnight’s vacation.

The first holiday week, I struggled with the guilt that I had a journal issue to edit, and ought to be doing the book-reviews I’d allocated myself.  I managed not to do any of it!  This was due to a combination of excessive domesticity, a self-imposed fitness regime, and end-of-term exhaustion.  By the second week, I had family obligations that took me away from home, and I read no more than the introduction to the first book-review book.  I’m driving home tomorrow.  It does feel as though I’ve had a mental break, but the guilt is now pressing on my shoulders like a heavy cloud, and I’m perplexed as to how I’ll catch up with my scholarly obligations.  It can’t be done in 10.5 hours a week, that’s for sure!

I’ve seen headlines in social media about how even full-time academics don’t get enough time in which to do research.  I can understand this, but I can’t make comparisons.  If an academic is not teaching, marking or administrating, then presumably some research can be done.  For me, by contrast, if it’s not a research day/morning, then I have the rest of my 9-to-5 taken up with a completely different role, and NO research can be done.  Likewise, I may have similar holiday allocation to my academic colleagues, but there’s a difference between that, and the length of the average undergraduate vacation.  During that time there are no undergraduate lecture or tutorial commitments.  I don’t have that difference at my disposal.

I’m sure I am not the only part-time researcher to feel this guilt.  I don’t think there’s an answer, either.  I’m moderately pleased with myself that I have deliberately, consciously taken a fortnight off, and only very occasionally opened my work email inbox to check that nothing crucial had popped into it.  I deleted a few irrelevant messages, and closed the inbox again.  My out-of-office message would have explained my silence, to anyone expecting to hear from me.  I haven’t come up with a strategy for catching up with my editing and writing obligations.  It may entail ignoring emails for a couple more days until I’ve reviewed those books!

I’d like to write a blogpost about the ISECS eighteenth-century history conference, but I fear it would be a bit of an indulgence, in the face of all that I personally absolutely have to do.

I wonder how other part-time researchers manage?  Any tips or tricks to share?

From Stationers’ Hall to the Wider World

With my most scholarly hat on, I can announce …

I have a magnificent idea for a research project, building upon my doctoral AND postdoc work, papers I’ve written, networks I’ve been involved with, and so on. I’ve written it all down as a discussion paper – I really think it could work. Watch this space!

 

The Dead Mouse

I’ve typed so much, and moved so much text around – not to mention manipulating images on the PowerPoint – that my mouse has died.

Yes, it has been another working weekend – I’ve edited and resubmitted a librarianship article to a librarianship journal, licked my seminar paper about Sir John Macgregor Murray into its final, polished shape, and totally indulged myself sourcing suitable images for the PowerPoint!   No kidding – I have had to abandon the mouse, which I’ve left twitching at the back of my desk.  It has had a long and interesting life.

I do have a day-trip planned for this week, to the archives of the Royal Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland.  I’m off to inspect more Macgregor Murray documents – I can’t NOT see them!  It has been an interesting assignment, because I’ve found out so much more about him than I knew at the time of writing my PhD.

And then … back to grant-writing.  And thoughts of Stationers’ Hall music, amongst other things!

Have You Met Your Original Objectives?

fishmosaic

One of the questions asked by ResearchFish – the private limited company responsible for collecting data about everyone’s grant-funded research – is this:-

“Have you met your original objectives?”

It’s a multiple-choice answer: Yes; No; Partially; or Too early to say.  I’ve devoted quite a bit of time to asking myself this question, and I believe that yes, I have achieved what I set out to achieve, with the help and support of all those who have involved themselves in the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall music research network.

fishmosaicThe project sought, in the first instance, to identify the patterns of survival of the Georgian music copyright material. Whilst aware that perhaps only one quarter of all Georgian-era published music was actually registered at Stationers’ Hall, we now have a very clear overall picture of the survival patterns of the registered musical material in historical legal deposit libraries, with the most obviously complete collections being at the British Library, the Bodleian and the University of Glasgow, and with the University of St Andrews’ collection close behind them.  Cambridge and Aberdeen University Libraries, and the National Library of Scotland have rather less, but cataloguing is incomplete, whilst Edinburgh University retained only a very modest amount of the copyright music that they received. (There’s a magnificent spreadsheet, and the music is now gradually being fully catalogued.)

Three libraries seem not to have retained music, for historical reasons tied up with the institutions themselves: Trinity College Dublin made a decision not to claim music; King’s Inns, also Dublin, was a legal library, and it is impossible to tell whether the unexpected small holdings of music arrived through legal deposit or by other means; and the theological Sion College’s surviving holdings, now in Lambeth Palace Library, appear not to have had any copyright music by the time of transfer.

fishmosaicSecondly, the project sought to identify where collections may not yet be catalogued online, to establish the extent of the work outstanding in order to facilitate access to the material in library special collections via Copac. We now have a clear picture of where holdings are not yet catalogued online; and until the time when the bulk of this material ­is retrospectively catalogued, big data analysis would perforce be somewhat misleading. On a more positive note, interest has been expressed in attempting to rectify this situation at four of the libraries, and the increased interest in the repertoire that this project has engendered, has certainly provided motivation.  Some interesting big data analysis was produced using data from the St Andrews material currently catalogued online, and data gathered from historical loan records of the entire St Andrews music copyright collection.  However, no other institution holds comparable loan records.

fishmosaicThe third objective concerned interdisciplinary networking, with the project offering an opportunity for networking by interested parties from all relevant disciplines, seeking to explore the history of British-published music in all British legal deposit libraries. Extensive networking, in person, via electronic means, and in print, has raised the profile of this repertoire. A workshop at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland brought together librarians from most of the historical copyright libraries, together with interested scholars from the fields of musicology, big data analysis and digitisation of resources, and library history.

Papers have been given at a number of conferences, with the possibility of more in future months; and relationships have been forged both nationally and internationally with individuals and with relevant organisations:- librarians, particularly in music libraries and special collections; book and library historians; musicologists, folklorists and copyright specialists; and contact with Stationers’ Hall itself.  In short, a wide range of people have been introduced to this project at the various events I’ve spoken at, from scholars of various disciplines, to librarians in different kinds of libraries, to folklorists, copyright specialists, local historians and genealogists, and users of archives.

fishmosaicA fourth objective was to draw together documentation in support of the interdisciplinary study of such collections’ history, by compiling a bibliography for the shared use of both librarians and scholars, which would itemise both archival sources and existing scholarship and writings on these music collections for future exploitation by scholars of various disciplines. A substantial bibliography has been compiled, detailing scholarship on all aspects of historical music copyright and legal deposit, also embracing some of the wider context of copyright legislation, and pertaining to music in individual institutions. Histories of individual libraries have been included, with the extent of archival documentation at the University of St Andrews standing out above most others, particularly in terms of the use made of the music copyright collection there.  This bibliography, currently online via the present network blog, will also very soon be made available via the institutional repository, Pure, at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland.

fishmosaicA fifth objective was to introduce and promote these collections and their research potential at interdisciplinary meetings and via appropriate publications. To this end, the study day at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland in March 2018, afforded delegates the opportunity to share knowledge about individual collections; to look ahead to future collaborative possibilities; and to reflect upon the need for further retrospective cataloguing; and to listen to a performance of some Napoleonic-era songs by women composers.

Themes arising from the study of this repertoire, and mentioned at the study day, have also been explored in subsequent conference papers and blogposts (both for this blog, and also as a guest blogger on others), demonstrating how the copyright collections provide a wealth of source material for studying the social and cultural history of music, eg the role of women in creating as well as performing music in the Georgian era; early music pedagogical repertoire; or the writing of popular songs and marches as a cultural response to the Napoleonic Wars.

The study day resulted in a commitment to produce a guest co-edited issue of Brio, the music librarianship journal of the International Association of Music Libraries’ UK and Ireland branch; authors have agreed to provide material in time for the November 2019 issue.

fishmosaicLastly, the project sought to foster the performance of music from these collections, encouraging network participants to consider small-scale local events to showcase this material. A performance of some Napoleonic songs composed by women had already taken place both in St Andrews and at the University of Glasgow before the commencement of the network proper, and two of these songs were performed at the study day itself. The opportunities posed by this kind of material have also been outlined in spoken conference and seminar papers, and the possibility of further educational outreach to under-18 year olds is still currently under discussion.  Key issues are that, whilst librarians are custodians of the rare musical materials, it would require collaboration between librarians, musicologists and performers to research the collections in order to present particular historical themes, and to facilitate live performances. Furthermore, the exploitation of music through performance is probably more likely to take place beyond, rather than in, individual libraries, thus making the coordination of such events more complicated than they might initially appear – but assuredly not impossible!

fishmosaicIn summary, the stated objectives of the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall networking project have certainly been met.  The challenge now, of course, is to examine the findings and, taking all considerations into account, to determine the most promising directions for future research!

blue-turquoise-mosaic.jpg

 

Research Impacts: Asking You!

 

fishmosaic

The other day, I blogged about research outcomes.  Much joy has been experienced in the logging of these – it’s actually quite rewarding to look back and see what has been achieved in one and a half days a week.  (Okay, some was admittedly achieved in evenings and weekends as well.  But an outcome’s an outcome, isn’t it?!)

However, if you’ve had an opportunity to glance at my recent guest-blogpost for IAML (UK and Ireland Branch), you’ll realise that the outcomes are only one side of the story.  So, today I’ve been contemplating research impacts.  This project has made networking connections with loads of people, libraries and organisations, so there’s no denying there has been impact within academia … but what about beyond the ivory towers?!  Some of the organisations have a preponderance of researchers, but others certainly embrace both academia and those in non-academic circles.

So, here’s my appeal to you: if you’ve been enjoying following the project, and you feel we’ve in any way influenced you in your academic OR non-academic existence, I’d positively love to hear from you.  I know I haven’t been blogging into a void, because people do respond to what they see … but I’d hate to think I had overlooked some impact or influence that was worth shouting about!  Similarly, do let me know what you’d like to happen next.

I’ve allowed comments on this post – but any form of communication, social-media or otherwise, would be very warmly welcomed!  Thank you.

Pathways, Outputs and Impacts: Being a Librarian-Researcher Today

gold-cobblestonesIAML (UK & Ireland) Guest-Blogpost

At last year’s Annual Study Weekend of my professional organisation (the International Association of Music Libraries, UK and Ireland Branch), I spoke to members about my experiences of successfully seeking research-grant funding.  And now here’s my guest-blogpost reminding colleagues about it:-

via Pathways, Outputs and Impacts: Being a Librarian-Researcher Today