History of Music Collections in Edinburgh University Library – 2 new articles!

Edinburgh_University_Library_2017
Edinburgh University Library (Wikimedia Commons image)

Readers of Brio (the professional journal of IAML UK and Ireland) will already have read the two-part contribution by Alastair Macdonald and Elizabeth Quarmby-Lawrence, which appeared in Autumn/Winter 2018 and Spring/Summer 2019.  However, if you don’t subscribe or have access to that august journal, you might not have seen them. They’re a major contribution to the field, so it’s important that they’re publicised! And yes, they’ve been added to the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall network bibliography on the present website, too.

  • Alastair Macdonald and Elizabeth Quarmby-Lawrence, ‘From General Reid to DCRM(M): Cataloguing the Music Collections of Edinburgh University Library. Part 1, The Early Reid Professors and the First Catalogues, 1807-1941’, Brio, 55.2 (2018), 27–49
  • Alistair Macdonald and Elizabeth Quarmby-Lawrence, ‘From General Reid to DCRM(M): Cataloguing the Music Collections of Edinburgh University Library. Part 2, Professional Librarians and Automation, 1947-2019.’, Brio, 56.1 (2019), 62–83.

 

 

 

https://wordpress.com/page/claimedfromstationershall.wordpress.com/1661

Guest Issue of Brio (IAML UK & Ireland) guidelines for contributors

Woohoo! It’s deadline time.  As you know, we’re contributing a special issue of Brio for IAML (UK and Ireland) on the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall theme.  We agreed to have all writings completed by the end of August, and contributors up and down the UK and Ireland have been – and are – eagerly scribbling their considered thoughts on different aspects of the topic.

Brio does have a very general set of guidelines for contributors, but when it comes to referencing, the main requirement is to be clear and consistent within each article.  Here’s a pdf of the guidelines, along with a quick screenshot of the first footnotes in the article on Edinburgh University Library’s music collections, already contributed by Alasdair Macdonald and Elizabeth Quarmby-Lawrence, Vol.55 no.2  (‘From General Reid to DCRM(M): Cataloguing the music collections of Edinburgh University Library, Part 1, The early Reid Professors and the first catalogues, 1807-1941)’, 27-49.

If the pdf doesn’t open for you, please let me know!

If you’re reading this but you’re not (yet) a member of IAML, then you might like to know more about us.

Sharing News: Early Music Monographs Digitized

This is a piece of news that I received via IAML (International Association of Music Libraries) and the MLA (the Music Library Association, an  American organisation).  Copying and pasting shamelessly, because this is news that’s bursting to get out, I offer you this exciting snippet:-

The Music Division of the Library of Congress has launched a new site with scans of approximately 2,000 books on music published before 1800.  The scans were made from microfilmed versions of the books.

https://www.loc.gov/collections/books-about-music-before-1800/about-this-collection/

Karen C. Lund is the Digital Project Coordinator for the Music Division.

Living With the Guilt (Being a Part-Time Researcher)

My research career, beginning with the start of my doctoral studies in 2004, has been entirely on a part-time basis.  I studied part-time whilst I worked full-time, and have since then had several secondments to part-time research whilst spending the rest of my working week occupying my regular professional role.

During my doctoral studies, I grew accustomed to the niggling question, “am I doing enough research?”  (It was accompanied by, “am I doing this parenting lark adequately?!”)

I felt reasonably confident that my professional role wasn’t suffering – after all, when I was at that desk, I was working the work!  But, in my student capacity, I had the memory of what full-time research “felt like”, from a previous doctoral attempt, and it was hard persuading myself that no-one expected me to achieve as much, as fast, when I was doing it entirely in evenings, at weekends and on holiday.  (Reading early nineteenth-century commentaries whilst at Eurocamp? Oh yes, been there!)

Fast-forward to my present 70:30 existence (70% librarian, 30% postdoc).  Desperate to be taken seriously as a researcher, I struggle to achieve as much as the average academic, when I’m only a researcher for 10.5 hours a week.  Reading, writing, researching, editing, attending conferences … I drive myself to produce “output” at a rate that makes me look like a force to be reckoned with, but honesty forces me to concede that some of it has to be done at home, in my own time.

So, I reached this summer.  Since May, I’ve been a guest-speaker at a workshop in Paris, contributed a pecha kucha at a copyright literacy seminar closely followed by a paper at a week-long international history conference (both  in Edinburgh), been an after-dinner speaker at an engagement in the Highlands, and then – oh, blessed relief, came a fortnight’s vacation.

The first holiday week, I struggled with the guilt that I had a journal issue to edit, and ought to be doing the book-reviews I’d allocated myself.  I managed not to do any of it!  This was due to a combination of excessive domesticity, a self-imposed fitness regime, and end-of-term exhaustion.  By the second week, I had family obligations that took me away from home, and I read no more than the introduction to the first book-review book.  I’m driving home tomorrow.  It does feel as though I’ve had a mental break, but the guilt is now pressing on my shoulders like a heavy cloud, and I’m perplexed as to how I’ll catch up with my scholarly obligations.  It can’t be done in 10.5 hours a week, that’s for sure!

I’ve seen headlines in social media about how even full-time academics don’t get enough time in which to do research.  I can understand this, but I can’t make comparisons.  If an academic is not teaching, marking or administrating, then presumably some research can be done.  For me, by contrast, if it’s not a research day/morning, then I have the rest of my 9-to-5 taken up with a completely different role, and NO research can be done.  Likewise, I may have similar holiday allocation to my academic colleagues, but there’s a difference between that, and the length of the average undergraduate vacation.  During that time there are no undergraduate lecture or tutorial commitments.  I don’t have that difference at my disposal.

I’m sure I am not the only part-time researcher to feel this guilt.  I don’t think there’s an answer, either.  I’m moderately pleased with myself that I have deliberately, consciously taken a fortnight off, and only very occasionally opened my work email inbox to check that nothing crucial had popped into it.  I deleted a few irrelevant messages, and closed the inbox again.  My out-of-office message would have explained my silence, to anyone expecting to hear from me.  I haven’t come up with a strategy for catching up with my editing and writing obligations.  It may entail ignoring emails for a couple more days until I’ve reviewed those books!

I’d like to write a blogpost about the ISECS eighteenth-century history conference, but I fear it would be a bit of an indulgence, in the face of all that I personally absolutely have to do.

I wonder how other part-time researchers manage?  Any tips or tricks to share?

Lanrick Castle, Centre Stage!

I have just stumbled across a whole video about Lanrick Castle – only touching upon Sir John MacGregor Murray’s time there, but it’s very evocative, so I thought you might like to see it for yourself.  You can imagine Sir John living there, and song-collector Alexander Campbell approaching it in 1815, perhaps a little in awe when he saw the grandeur inside:-

Dr Peter J. Gordon’s website is called “Hole Ousia”.  You’ll find the Lanrick Castle video here:- https://holeousia.com/time-passes-listen/ruins/lanrick-castle-demolished/

A Trip To Killin (Clan Gregor Weekend)

Last weekend, I had the honour of being after-dinner speaker for Clan Gregor at their annual gathering.  I gave a talk (which lasted about 20 minutes) about their ancestor, Sir John MacGregor Murray.  It was based on the talk I gave at the Sorbonne, but slightly modified.  (See my PowerPoint with a very brief verbal commentary – not the entire talk!)

Maybe you’d just like to hear Niel/Nathaniel Gow’s tune, Sir John MacGregor Murray in the Celtic Chair?  Audio link to SoundCloud

Teaching About Musical Paratext

A few years ago, I published an article in a librarianship journal, about librarians teaching, and the question of teaching music students about paratext in early national song collections.

Let me state here and now, my approach to article titles has changed, and I would never again try to be ‘clever’ or controversial in this regard.  A perfectly acceptable article was made to look flippant, or even worse, by my woeful enjoyment of puns and double-entendres.

Nonetheless, because I’d like to share the article, I’ll endure the embarrassment of sharing the title with you.  This is a pre-publication version, which I’ll also upload to our institutional repository in the near future:-

‘Sexy’ bibliography (and revealing paratext)

bluebells-1429817_960_720Engaging with students in teaching bibliographic citation, and demonstrating the significance of paratext in historical national song collections.

General information

 

Niel and Nathaniel Gow’s Controlling Influence? | Bass Culture in Scottish musical traditions

Paratext jacket
Paratext jacket – harps and flowers

In connection with my continuing interest in paratextual matter in national song and dance music, I’m sharing some postings I wrote whilst I was a postdoctoral researcher on the Bass Culture project. (See hms.scot for the web outcomes of that project).

Shared link no.2:-

https://bassculture.info/?p=416