Dr Karen McAulay explores the history of Scottish music collecting, publishing and national identity from the 18th to 20th centuries. Research Fellow at Royal Conservatoire of Scotland, author of two Routledge monographs.
Rossini, painting via ArtUK from Royal Society of Musicians of Great Britain
It is an inescapable fact that many a late Georgian or early Victorian music cabinet must have contained at least one set of piano variations on an operatic theme by Rossini. There are just so many of them! Since they proliferated in the 1820s (ie the last decade of Rossini’s operatic compositional phase, and the era when he also visited Britain), you won’t find them listed in Kassler’s Music Entries at Stationers’ Hall – his bibliography ends in December 1818. But you have only to search Copac or glance at St Andrews University Library’s listings, to see how many composers were inspired to write virtuosic variations on the great man’s tunes.
What did Rossini think of this, I wonder? I’ve only started to scratch the surface of this particular enquiry, but to date I’ve discovered only that copyright legislation was not as advanced in Italy as it is in the UK. What’s more, there may not be very many extant letters by the great man from the 1820s, and that the authoritative modern edition of his letters is in Italian. I do know Rossini would have been very conversant with legal documents, considering the number of contracts he signed for his many, many operas. None of this tells me (yet!) what Rossini thought of other composers making free use of his lovely melodies.
Rossini, painting via ArtUK from Royal College of Music
What I do have is William Lockhart’s article in Music and Letters (vol.93 no.2, 2012), ‘Trial by ear: legal attitudes to keyboard arrangement in nineteenth-century Britain’; Charles Michael Carroll’s ‘Musical Borrowing – Grand Larceny or Great Art?’ in College Music Symposium (vol.18 no.1, 1978); and Derek Miller’s Copyright and the Value of Performance, 1770-1911 (2018). I shall in due course have a couple more books on Rossini, so I haven’t yet given up on finding out how he felt about this evidence of his popularity. Maybe he just felt flattered – but I’d love to find his own words on the subject!
As for his published letters? Well, I may have to look for them. I know a little Italian, thankfully. But meanwhile, if you know anyone who has read the recent edition, please do let me now! I’d be deeply grateful!
I’m delighted to introduce today’s blogpost by Andrea Cawelti, who is the Ward Music Cataloger at Houghton Library, Harvard University. Andrea attended a course at the American Rare Book School a couple of years ago, and is keen for everyone to know what a wonderful opportunity it would be for anyone who could attend this year’s course. I shared a link to Andrea’s reflections on the course, which she authored for the Houghton Library blog last year – you’ll find the link in the posting below. Now you can read more about it – if you manage to get there, do please consider sharing your own experiences here!
Philadelphia skyline (Pixabay image)
Fellow readers of Claimed from Stationers’ Hall may be aware that the American incarnation of Rare Book School has offered a course on the Stationers’ Hall since Peter Blayney, one of the stalwart fathers of research on the Stationers, taught the course in the 1990s. But I see that applications have been opened today for this summer course, now taught by Professor Ian Gadd, so I’d like to share a bit about my excellent experience in taking this course in 2016, as prompt applications are usually the most successful.
This term, as in 2016, the course will be held in Philadelphia, June 2-7, at the Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts at the University of Pennsylvania, with reasonably-priced and comfortable dorm space available within easy walking distance through the picturesque Penn campus. As this course represented my first experience at the Kislak Center, I was delightfully surprised by our genuine welcome, and helpful assistance by the staff, both of the library and those in attendance from the Rare Book School, even though this wasn’t their turf. The Center holds significant hand-press material for examination and project fodder, and Penn Libraries holds a complete set of microfilms of the Stationers’ Company registers and archives, which we consulted extensively for our work.
As with all RBS courses, ample opportunities are presented for individual discussion, questions, and networking, including regular morning and afternoon breaks, lunches, and receptions. Evenings often include programmed activities from lectures to film presentations, and during my course, there was an excellent presentation by Lynne Farrington, senior curator at the Kislak, on American subscription publishers and their German-American readers. Dr. Farrington provided a fascinating overview of the American subscription publishing industry, and how it was utilized for foreign-language titles to be sold through the subscription network. The lecture was accompanied by a hand-on exploration of subscription samples from several of the Kislak’s collections.
Enough of that, you may say, what about the course itself?!?!?! Well, first of all, I should mention that I arrived with a specific agenda, which was to familiarize myself with the Registers, what was in them of a music format, and to learn how to use the microfilms most effectively (Harvard, too, holds a complete set of these microfilms).
Like many of you I’m sure, I’ve had cases where I’d hoped to find a specific date in the 18th century when something had been published, or to establish some kind of sequence for several publications, and had been frustrated by my inability to harness these resources. Now of course, newer products are available, including the Literary Print Culture online access, which Professor Gadd has now incorporated into the course. Still, the navigation of this product isn’t straightforward, and one really needs to know what one is doing before attempting to use, or it is easy to get completely lost.
Course schedule
As you can see, the schedule was laid out to allow us a proper introduction to the history of the company and its archives: Professor Gadd offered spirited presentations on each aspect, as well as providing references to online and printed documentation which would be of use later in our explorations. Each of us was then tasked to research and present on some topic of particular interest to us (see “research time” and “presentation time” in the daily schedule). I chose a particular segment of time and explored all of the Registers chronologically to gain an idea of what music was being brought to the Stationers for registration between 1799 and 1804. Several of my discoveries ended up in our Houghton Blog, which presents a bit more information for those who are interested.
I had honestly come into this course completely unaware of how extensive the Stationers’ archives were apart from the Registers! Learning more about the “people” documentation was particularly eye-opening, and quite helpful in my cataloging. The online index to the London Book Trades for instance, based on the Stationers’ archives is great for finding more information on printers when researching, creating authority records, or for investigating connections between people. As always, Professor Gadd provided helpful hints: don’t use the “search” box, just go directly to the “index – names”. There were so many trails of bread crumbs offered to us, that who could remember them all (certainly not I!) Knowing this, the professor provided us with an extensive workbook to take home, complete with bibliography and most useful for me after the fact, an overview of the most important copyright legislation affecting just what was registered with the Company.
Workbook table of contents
While this course only goes up to 1775, and consequently doesn’t cover some of the most influential music-related legislation, suggested readings within provide an appendix as it were, and after going through the history before 1775, reading forward into the 1790s was not difficult. Additional revealing segments covered what species of books were included in the English Stock and why this was important, and an introduction to Edward Arber’s term catalogues – keyword-searchable, and covering (among others and appendices) periods into the 18th century. A mind-boggling amount of work, which doesn’t include that much music but is well worth a look.
Two and a half years later, am I glad I took the course? You bet I am; it has proved to be perhaps one of the most useful courses I’ve taken at RBS. Possibly more so for me, because I was essentially ignorant of so many details of the Stationers’ history, but I would heartily recommend this to anyone preparing to work with, or already working with 17th to 18th century music. The context will provide you with an invaluable overview of how printing functioned in Britain, and how and why and what was registered. I hope that I’ve given something of the flavor of the course, and if anyone has questions about how RBS works, please do ask the RBS:-
If you’re considering attending, you can find out more about the RBS on their website. The homepage explains, “Rare Book School provides continuing-education opportunities for students from all disciplines and skill levels to study the history of written, printed, and digital materials with leading scholars and professionals in the field.”
Be quick! The early bird catches the worm, as they say.
Good luck and good researching!
Andrea Cawelti Ward Music Cataloger Houghton Library Harvard University
Sir Giles Gilbert Scott, Tower architect – image from RIBA/ArtUK
Here’s a fantastic webpage devoted to the exhibition that Cambridge University Library mounted last year. It’s an excellent read, and I’ve got the link saved for addition to the next update of our network music legal deposit bibliography. But I can’t wait to share it with you, so here it is – for your mindful enjoyment:-
(I confess, I have just sauntered via the Amazon page to buy Stephen Fry’s novel, The Liar(2004) for my Kindle. It’s set in the University Library. But that’s for leisure reading, so I must leave it aside for a while!)
This is turning into a busy week! Here’s another interesting call for essays, this time from the Women’s Study Group. Picture me, if you will, twirling like a top as I decide which of all these opportunities to turn my attention to first!
Quoting, with permission, from the email that was kindly forwarded to me:-
“The Art and Science of Collecting in Eighteenth-Century Europe
Edited by Dr. Arlene Leis and Dr. Kacie Wills
“We are inviting chapter abstracts for a collection of essays designed for academics, specialists and enthusiasts interested in the interrelations between art, science and collecting in Europe during the long 18th century. Our volume will discuss the topic of art, science and collecting in its broadest sense and in diverse theoretical contexts, such as art historical, feminist, social, gendered, colonial, archival, literary and cultural ones. To accompany our existing contributions, we welcome essays that take a global and material approach, and are particularly keen on research that makes use of new archival resources. We encourage interdisciplinary perspectives and are especially interested in essays that reveal the way in which women participated in art, science, and collecting in some capacity.
“The compendium will consist of around 15 essays, 6000 words each (including footnotes), with up to four illustrations. In addition to these more traditional essays, we are looking for shorter (circa 1,000 words) case studies on material objects pertaining to collections/collectors from that period. The subject of art, science and collecting will also be central to these contributions. These smaller pieces will each include one illustration. The following topics/case studies are particularly desired:
Women’s Collecting Interests
Histories and methodologies of collecting, taxonomies, cataloging, arrangement, and modes of display
Cabinets of curiosities
Catalogues
Collections housed in art and/or science institutions
The boundaries between the natural and the artificial
Scientific and artistic tools and instruments
Seriality vs. Rare objects
Transitional Objects
Conservation
Collecting networks
The artist collector
The scientist collector
The overlapping of art, science and collecting in domestic spaces.
“Essay abstracts of 500 words and 300 word abstracts for smaller case studies are due January 30, 2019 and should be sent along with a short bio to: artsciencecollecting@gmail.com
“Finished case studies will be due July 30, 2019, and due date for long essays will be September 30, 2019.
Must be the start of the year – there’s a sudden outpouring of calls for papers, conference registrations and other exciting challenges. Here’s one for this morning – Musica Scotica is a network I’ve long been associated with.
We are delighted to announce that the Icepops 2019 call for contributions is now open. The conference is taking place on 26th June 2019 at the University of Edinburgh and you have from now until the 4th February to come up with an idea for your presentation.
We are looking for speakers on all aspects of copyright education from a variety of different perspectives. Last year we attracted expert speakers from educational & cultural institutions, publishing houses and government departments as well as an impressive number of international delegates. Our first keynote this year is composer, publisher and scholar Simon Anderson, who will be opening the conference with a musical theme. We particularly welcome sessions that might compliment this. However, we also retain the playful learning theme from last year and our afternoon keynote, the award-winning Charlie Farley from the University of Edinburgh will be leading an interactive workshop.
We would like to encourage presenters to address one of the themes of this year’s conference:
– Universal Copyright Literacy: bridging the gaps between lawyers, IP teachers, specialists and copyright muggles
– Engaging and creative approaches to copyright education including using games, music and performance
– Copyright education as part of digital and information literacy initiatives
– Copyright education in the cultural heritage sector
– Teaching copyright as part of scholarly and open practices
However, we wouldn’t want you to feel constrained if you have a great idea relating to copyright literacy that doesn’t fit 100% into any of the above. Please just let us know and we’ll see if it fits in the programme.
I’m pleased to be sharing this call for essays, which I saw on a mailing-list to which I subscribe. I’m just quoting the entire call, by permission of the editors:-
Call for Essays
Impressions, Vol. 2: Essays on the Art of Printing, The Legacy Press
The Impressions series encompasses all the printing arts: relief, intaglio, lithographic, serigraphic, and digital, as well as related arts, such as stamping, stenciling, and pochoir.
Vol. 1 has filled, and we are taking essays for Vol. 2, which is open to any Impressions topic. Impressions welcomes published scholars, new authors, established areas of inquiry, and topics not previously addressed in other publications. Impressions is particularly interested in studies that use images both as evidence and examples for visual learning.
printing and printmaking
book arts
practical printing
bibliography
history and criticism (book, printing, literary, art, cultural)
interviews
digitization and the printing arts
conservation
archives, collections, libraries, information
collecting
If you have an essay in preparation or if you would like more information about Impressions, please email series editor Rebecca Chung: chung.rm@gmail.com
I am a Performing Arts Librarian 3.5 days a week, and a Postdoctoral Researcher 1.5 days a week. In this self-imposed annual review, I’m not listing routine activities conducted in either capacity; it goes without saying that I’ve answered queries, catalogued, delivered library research training to a number of different class groups, attended meetings, and pursued research-related activities and fieldwork.
From September 2017 to September 2018, I was the AHRC-funded Principal Investigator for a new research network, the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall music research project. Since then, I have continued to conduct research and network with the various scholars and libraries involved with this project, and in the new year shall be pursuing further grant-funding in order to extend the reach of the project.
As someone who continually asks themselves, “Am I doing enough?”, I feel that even I can be reasonably content with this year’s outputs!
JANUARY
Chaired sessions at Traditional Pedagogies, international conference at Royal Conservatoire of Scotland
Book chapter, ‘Wynds, Vennels and Dual Carriageways: the changing Nature of Scottish Music’, in Understanding Scotland musically: folk, tradition and policy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, p. 230-239.
MARCH
Claimed From Stationers’ Hall Workshop, Royal Conservatoire of Scotland, (26 Mar)
Scottish Library & Information Council (SLIC) From PGCert to PG Certainty: Enabling the Distance Learner (invited talk, sectoral organisation) (March 2018)
APRIL
IAML(UK & Irl) Annual Study Weekend, invited talk, Pathways, outputs and impacts: the ‘Claimed from Stationers Hall’ music project takes wings
IAML(UK & Irl) Annual Study Weekend From PGCert to PG Certainty: Enabling the Distance Learner (quick-fire session) (April 2018)
EAERN (Eighteenth-century Arts Education Research Network), ‘Claimed From Stationers’ Hall: But What Happened Next?’ (University of Glasgow, 6 June)
Romantic Song Network steering group seminar at British Library
JULY
IAML/AIBM Annual Congress, Leipzig, ‘A Network of Early British Legal Deposit Music: Explored through Modern Networking
SEPT
RMA Conference, Bristol, ‘Overlapping Patterns: the Extant Late Georgian Copyright Music Explored by Modern Research Networking’
NOV
Field-trip to King’s Inns and Trinity College Dublin Libraries, and British Library
EFDSS Conference, London, ‘National Airs in Georgian British Libraries’
ARLGS (Academic and Research Libraries Group Scotland) Teachmeet at Glasgow University Library – speaker
Article, Trafalgar Chronicle, New Series 3 (2018), 202-212, jointly authored with Brianna Robertson-Kirkland, ‘My love to war is going’: Women and Song in the Napoleonic Era’.
DEC
Article, Information Professional, Nov-Dec 2018, ‘Coffee and Collaboration’ [teaching electronic resource strategies]
Additionally, I have authored 79 blogposts and 5 Newsletters in connection with the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall research project.
William Hawes (1785-1846) was a singer, conductor and composer in a variety of high-profile institutions, beginning with his appointment as a chorister at the Chapel Royal. Work as a deputy lay vicar at Westminster Abbey was followed by his becoming a Gentleman of the Chapel Royal, later becoming Master of the Choristers at St Paul’s and Master of the Children at the Chapel Royal. He was also an associate of the Philharmonic Society, a leading light in the Regent’s Harmonic Institution, a lay vicar of Westminster Abbey, conductor of the Madrigal Society, and organist of the Lutheran Chapel. And then there was his work with the operatic scene, too. He was clearly quite an important person on the contemporary London musical scene.
For some reason, William Hawes had the Stationers’ Hall music registrations from 1789 to 1818 copied into a manuscript, A List of Music Entered at Stationers’ Hall, from January 1 1789, to January 1, 1819. 1818 had seen the inception of the Regent’s Harmonic Institution, and Krummel suggests in Kassler’s edition of Music Entries at Stationers’ Hall 1710-1818 (2004) that the manuscript was probably connected with establishing when music would go out of copyright (after twenty-eight years), becoming legally reprintable. (Kassler, ix)
By Charles Heath, after William Westall
You can read more about the Regent’s Harmonic Institution in Oxford Music Online. It’s an institution I’d like to learn more about in due course:-
“Regent’s Harmonic Institution [ Royal Harmonic Institution ] English firm of music publishers . It was founded in London in 1818 as a joint-stock company of 23 (then 21) professional musicians, including Attwood, Ayrton, J.B. Cramer, William Hawes, Ries, George Smart, Thomas Welsh and Samuel Wesley, to finance reconstruction of the Argyll Rooms, Regent Street…” Leanne Langley (2001)
But I digress. When Kassler produced his edition of Music Entries, he combined his own transcriptions from the Registers with those of Don Krummel and Alan Tyson, as far as the year 1810, but used Hawes’ transcription for the years 1811-1818. This became the cut-off point for Kassler’s edition, in order to restrict the work to one volume.
Now, I should like to extend transcriptions forward to 1836. That’s the year when new legislation changed the legal deposit stipulations, reducing the number of legal deposit libraries and for those that lost their privilege, instituting a new system of granting library book-budgets instead. How to make my idea happen is the question that is exercising me at the moment!
On this day … ballads, rondos, anthems, glees and variations on operatic themes
19th December 2018 is a significant day in Claimed From Stationers’ Hall terms, because the very last transcribed entries in William Hawes’ manuscript were those originally entered exactly 200 years ago. And it was a good day for music, albeit a busy one for warehouse keeper Mr Greenhill – no less than sixteen musical entries. Five from publisher Goulding, followed by six from Power, two from Birchall, one that may have been from Chappell alone (it’s hard to tell in Copac), one from Clementi, and one published by both Clementi and Chappell. This last isn’t in Copac, but a copy can be traced in Berlin via WorldCat.
Goulding
Samuel Webbe, Jr’s Edward, a ballad – surviving in the most likely copyright libraries:- Aberdeen, the Bodleian, the British Library, Glasgow and St Andrews.
Ferdinand Ries’ When the wind blows, rondo, no.1, op.84, surviving in Aberdeen, the British Library and Glasgow.
Ries’ Popular French air with variations, no.4, op.84 – the same five libraries above.
Henry Rowley Bishop’s I have kept the ways of the Lord, anthem (in memory of Queen Charlotte [died 17.11.1818]) – same five libraries, and also in Edinburgh (whose copy isn’t yet catalogued online)
Bishop’s Hark! The solemn, distant bell (again, in memory of Queen Charlotte [died 17.11.1818]) – same five libraries, and in Edinburgh (as above)
Power
Thomas Simpson Cooke’s The dandy beau: a song – Aberdeen, British Library, Glasgow and St Andrews
Thomas Attwood’s Her hands were clasp’d (a Thomas Moore text from Lalla Rookh) – Aberdeen, British Library, Glasgow and St Andrews
John Clarke’s The Peri pardoned (song from Lalla Rookh) – Aberdeen, Bodleian, British Library and St Andrews
Frances L Hummell, or Hunnell’s My love is like the red, red rose – only in the Bodleian and the British Library
Joseph William Holder’s La belle Hariette [Henriette] with variations – Aberdeen, British Library and St Andrews
Thomas Howell’s Six progressive sonatinas for piano forte – Aberdeen, the Bodleian, the British Library, Glasgow and St Andrews
Birchall
Carlo Michele Alessio Sola’s – Amabili Britanne, canzonetta – the same five libraries
Sola’s Amor possente amore, canzonetta – the same five libraries
Chappell?
Ries’ La charmante Gabrielle, with variations [cannot trace Ries’s piece in Copac, but maybe it could be a piece indexed as by Onslow, published by Chappell]
Clementi
Ries’ Venetian air, with variations – Aberdeen and the British Library
Clementi, Cheapside, and Chappell, New Bond Street
Ries’ Air from Griselda (by Ferdinand Paer) with variations [again not in Copac but in Worldcat we find: A favorite air from Paer’s Celebrated Opera Griselda. Can only trace in the Berlin Staatsbibliothek – and digitised under the auspices of the Europeana project.
Considering what was registered, it’s not surprisingly a very typical collection of pieces for the era. I’ve found the library locations of surviving copies listed online, generally using Copac but occasionally also resorting to WorldCat – but this doesn’t mean that a few more might not yet turn up in collections not fully catalogued online to date. I wonder if anyone would like to check their card catalogues?! You’ll observe that there’s a fairly clear pattern of which libraries kept their legal deposit music. In the ensuing 200 years, it isn’t too surprising that the numbers of surviving copies varies just a little. Indeed, I find it quite remarkable that as many copies do survive!
Season’s Greetings to all followers of the Claimed From Stationers’ Hall music research project. I bring you pictures of Edinburgh in festive mode, after yesterday’s trip to the University Library! There’s a big posting coming up tomorrow – do check back in to see!